Gather the submission
Start with one submission type and the documents your team already receives. Agree which fields and evidence the pack needs.
Insurance operations · Brokers & MGAs
Get the submission ready for market.
Missing documents. Repeated follow-up. Another version of the same pack. We’re exploring a simpler way to prepare submissions for broker review.
Request a workflow review ↗20 minutes · One recurring bottleneck · A practical next step
WORKFLOW EXAMPLEIllustrative
ApplicationLoss historyExposure file
Proposed output
Submission review pack
01
Evidence, organized
Source documents linked to the summary.
02
Missing items, visible
Outstanding requirements in one checklist.
03
Next step, prepared
Follow-up drafted for broker review.
Human review before action
A proposed pilot workflow. Inputs and outputs are agreed during scoping.
Start where work gets stuck
Between the first email and a pack your broker can use.
The proposed workflow
One handoff.
Made easier to review.
Start with a bounded preparation task. Agree the inputs, the output and where a person takes over before testing.
Surface the gaps
Evaluate a structured summary, source references and a checklist of missing information. Prepare follow-up for broker review.
Review the handoff
A broker checks the pack and decides what goes to market. Test any approved system update as a separate step.
The broker owns the decision.
Market selection, advice, sending and binding remain with your team. This proposed pilot focuses on preparing the information they need.
Meet Brend · 1 min 53 sec
From what you see
to work done.
See the broader idea behind Datawall, from damage-inspection visualizations to a construction-insurance workflow demonstration.
Start with the vision, then choose one preparation task to evaluate with your team.
Brand film · Includes illustrative sequences and a workflow demonstration. Pilot scope is agreed separately.
A useful first pilot
Prove one workflow.
Measure the difference.
One team. One file type. A shared definition of success. Compare the current process with a supervised evaluation before expanding.
01
Preparation time
Hands-on minutes spent getting one file ready.
02
Completeness
Required items present at the first review.
03
Corrections
Changes the reviewer needs to make.
04
Time to handoff
Elapsed time from receipt to a usable packet.
What happens in the first conversation?
Walk through a recent example, identify the person who owns the work, and agree what would make a test useful. Confirm feasibility, sample access and timing together.
A different handoff?
Working on claim files?
Explore the proposed evidence-to-file workflow for property claims teams.
Let’s start with your workflow
Where does the file get stuck?
Bring one recurring bottleneck. We’ll explore whether a small, measurable pilot makes sense.