Bring the evidence together
Start with a defined set of documents, photos and notes. Agree what a complete file should contain for this workflow.
Insurance operations · Property claims
Less chasing.
A clearer claim file.
The evidence has arrived. The paperwork is still waiting. We’re building Datawall to turn scattered documents and field evidence into review-ready work.
Request a workflow review ↗20 minutes · One recurring bottleneck · A practical next step
WORKFLOW EXAMPLEIllustrative
Field notesPhotosEstimate
Proposed output
Claim review packet
01
Evidence, organized
Source documents linked to the summary.
02
Missing items, visible
Questions to resolve before the next handoff.
03
Next step, prepared
A clear handoff for the assigned reviewer.
Human review before action
A proposed pilot workflow. Inputs and outputs are agreed during scoping.
Start where work gets stuck
Between receiving the evidence and having a file someone can review.
The proposed workflow
One handoff.
Made easier to review.
Start with a bounded preparation task. Agree the inputs, the output and where a person takes over before testing.
Prepare the review packet
Evaluate an organized summary, references to the original evidence and a checklist of missing items.
Keep the reviewer in control
A person checks the file and approves the next step. Validate any destination-system update separately.
The adjuster owns the decision.
Coverage, assessment and settlement remain with your team. This proposed pilot focuses on getting the information ready for their review.
Meet Brend · 1 min 53 sec
From what you see
to work done.
See the broader idea behind Datawall, from damage-inspection visualizations to a construction-insurance workflow demonstration.
Start with the vision, then choose one preparation task to evaluate with your team.
Brand film · Includes illustrative sequences and a workflow demonstration. Pilot scope is agreed separately.
A useful first pilot
Prove one workflow.
Measure the difference.
One team. One file type. A shared definition of success. Compare the current process with a supervised evaluation before expanding.
01
Preparation time
Hands-on minutes spent getting one file ready.
02
Completeness
Required items present at the first review.
03
Corrections
Changes the reviewer needs to make.
04
Time to handoff
Elapsed time from receipt to a usable packet.
What happens in the first conversation?
Walk through a recent example, identify the person who owns the work, and agree what would make a test useful. Confirm feasibility, sample access and timing together.
A different handoff?
Preparing submissions?
Explore the proposed submission-preparation workflow for brokers and MGAs.
Let’s start with your workflow
Where does the file get stuck?
Bring one recurring bottleneck. We’ll explore whether a small, measurable pilot makes sense.